The first message I saw was an Internet ad that used motion to grab my attention. In it, motorcycles zoomed off one by one. The ad was attempting to persuade me that a fast bike such as the one advertised would enhance me personally. The second ad I saw was on a billboard. It used large text to catch my eye. It was asking if the reader had been injured in a car accident, the ad was for legal assistance. The ad was strategically placed alongside a busy road. While this ad was not trying to make me feel a certain way, it was trying to persuade me (provided I’d been in a crash) to choose their legal counsel.
The third ad I encountered was on Youtube. It came on right before a video. The ad showed a man plagued by an upset stomach. Then the medicine, Alka-Seltzer was introduced. As soon as he took it he felt better. Here the ad was using a specific situation to get me to use their product. Now if I have an upset stomach that ad will be in the back of my mind, which is what they want.
The third ad I encountered was on Youtube. It came on right before a video. The ad showed a man plagued by an upset stomach. Then the medicine, Alka-Seltzer was introduced. As soon as he took it he felt better. Here the ad was using a specific situation to get me to use their product. Now if I have an upset stomach that ad will be in the back of my mind, which is what they want.
I did not find the first ad to be effective. I say this because it was rather bland. All it showed were motorcycles on a white background with nifty looking text. Had I been inclined to buy a motorcycle I would not have purchased one from them just based on the ad. The other two ads I found to be effective. The billboard got straight to the point with their slogan guarantee “You don’t pay a dime unless we win your case.” The medicine ad featured a common situation and the promise of fast relief so I would also deem it effective.